Save Our Town free bumper stickers, fliers and petitions have been placed at:
Magpie Café at the Tannery
Ganesh Imports, on State Street
Angie’s Coffee Shop, on Pleasant Street
Leary’s Fine Wines, on Merrimac Street
Fowle’s Market, on High Street
Save Our Town—Newburyport, MA bumper sticker
Mary Eaton
Newburyport
Ok folks, there’s a new citizens’ group—“Save Our Town.”
Save Our Town came about one day when Sarah White, Steve Rudolph and Mary Eaton (yes, that’s me) were sitting around discussing issues in Newburyport, MA and were wondering what in the world to do.
Save Our Town—Save Newburyport’s historic character, charm and beauty—Be the voice of responsible growth.
Preserve Newburyport’s historic character, charm and beauty
Save Our Town has its own website www.saveourtown.us .
There are also free bumper stickers.
Save Our Town—Newburyport, MA bumper sticker
There is a Save Our Town flier and a Save Our Town petition.
The Save Our Town petition says:
“We the undersigned wish to preserve Newburyport’s historic buildings, landscapes, and local neighborhood character. We support responsible growth in Newburyport, Massachusetts.”
You can contact Save Our Town at:
info@saveourtown.us
www.saveourtown.us
Mary Eaton
Newburyort
Ok folks,
This is the word on the street. Proposed Newburyport Planning Director Christopher Ryan has withdrawn his name.
More later.
Mary Eaton
Newburyport
(Eitor’s Note: This has been confirmed, see the Undertoad Blog for more details. Apparently Mayor Moak intends to start the entire process from scratch.)
Yesterday I had a gentleman call me who was interested in working as a planner in Newburyport, MA. This was a first, emails from a variety of people in the planning community about a variety of planning issues, yes, but never a member of the planning community calling the Newburyport Political Blog about a planning job.
The first thing I asked him was how long he had been a planner and if he was happy where he was. He is very happy where he is and has been there for roughly 10 years. The gist my response to him was, “if you are a good planner and you are happy where you are, don’t come here.” It is unbelievably sad, if not downright heart breaking that that would be my very honest reply.
He was interested in working in Newburyport, MA because this City is “one of the most, if not the most beautiful and historic places in Massachusetts.”
I explained to him that if he was interested in the City Planner job, the mayor was thinking or revising that job to include a lot of what the Newburyport Building Inspector does, taking away from the role of what a City Planner in my mind should be. You could almost hear his eyes widen in disbelief at the other end of the telephone.
I explained to him that during the last roughly 14 years or so we’ve had a mayor every 2 years. And since the Planning Director is appointed by the mayor, the job of Planning Director is at the mercy of local politics. I think the reply was something along the line of “you’re kidding.”
I explained to him that our beautiful and unique architecture has absolutely no protection. He couldn’t believe it. His response was that even many of the smallest New England towns that weren’t particularly historic had Local Historic Districts. My reply, “Nope, not us.”
I explained to him that we were experiencing a rash of developers who do not have the City’s best interest at heart. His response was that “pretty soon there would be nothing left” of Newburyport, MA and the town essentially would be worthless. “Amen” to that.
I told him that someone during the last 14 years who was associated with the Planning Office had told me that it was “easier to work for the Mob than to work in Newburyport, MA.” I doubt that the Chamber of Commerce would be happy with me. This was not exactly positive spin.
Basically on the other end of the phone there was a lot of “you’ve got to be kidding,” “I can’t believe it,” “No way.”
It was a very sad phone call. And I found myself unbelievably angry at what we as a City are at the brink of, because this planner was absolutely right. If things keep going way they are going, and the issues are complex and multi-determine—much bigger than the current administration, the planner is correct, we will have nothing left. Newburyport, MA will be no different than a whole variety of generic places in New England and the Commonwealth of Massachusetts.
Folks, we are in a lot of trouble and if we do not do something, we will be in a world of hurt.
Mary Eaton
Newburyport
George Cushing (the political consultant for the Newburyport Political Blog) of Frog Pond at Newburyport’s Bartlett Mall, is quite distressed at the impending departure of Julie LaBranche, Newburyport’s City Planner.
George Cushing is not alone. Apparently many of the frogs at Frog Pond at the Bartlett Mall feel the same way. And George Cushing’s cousin Georgette Cushing of Frog Pond is so distressed that she has decided to accompany Julie on her journeys.
Georgette Cushing is a warmer, gentler version of George Cushing of Frog Pond at the Bartlett Mall.
George Cushing saying good-bye to his cousin
Georgette Cushing of Frog Pond at the Bartlett Mall
who is joining Julie LaBranche as she journeys on
From Geordie Vining of the Newburyport Planning Office:
Please come to a Good-bye Party for City Planner Julie LaBranche
Please join us for an informal get-together on 8-30-06 to extend our appreciation to Julie LaBranche for all her good work for the City, and to wish her well in her new pursuits.
Wednesday, August 30th
Moseley Woods park
(at Spofford and Merrimac Streets)
4:00 p.m. – 6:00 p.m.
If you can come, please bring an hors d’oeuvre and/or beverage to the pavilion to share.
(Anyone is invited — please spread the word. Please RSVP to me (Geordie Vining) if you think you can come so that we have some sense of the number of people. Thanks.)
Mary Eaton
Newburyport
Ok I just couldn’t resist.
I went to last night’s meeting of the Newburyport City Council Planning and Development subcommittee to sit and listen to who our next Planning Director would most probably be.
I came away thinking, “Boy, am I glad I’m not on the Newburyport City Council.” Because after last night’s meeting with proposed planning director Christopher Ryan I would have a lot of sleepless nights figuring on how I was going to vote on this one.
Bottom line, Christopher Ryan seems to be a very bright, capable gentleman, but just does not seem to be a match for the City of Newburyport, MA …well, that was my take.
I was impressed, 9 out of the 11 City Councilors were there, I imagine the other 2 were on vacation (it is August.)
Before the meeting Mr. Ryan looked nervous. And Mayor Moak when he arrived looked very nervous. Mrs. Moak looked a little tense herself. I quipped to somebody, “As long as Mr. Ryan has done his homework and hasn’t killed his grandmother, everything’s going to be just fine.”
My impression was that Christopher Ryan was very candid and not manipulative in the least.
He had not done his homework. He had not read the Newburyport Master Plan or the Zoning Code or any of the other pertinent documents. You could almost hear the entire audience murmur, “Say what?”
He also made it very clear that he was dedicated to the teaching job in the Fall and that was where all his energies at the moment were going and that he would be teaching again in the “Spring” semester, January-March 2007.
Again you could almost hear the entire audience mumble “excuse me?”
He admitted quite candidly that he had (I think I have the phrase right) “very little” experience in historic preservation. Yes, you can hear the reaction …“What?”
And there was a lot of chit chat about the ability to get along with the Building Inspector ….a lot of biting of lower lips and eyes raised to the ceiling among the people in the audience.
I thought the Planning and Development subcommittee was very professional. No, they were not warm and fuzzy, but that was not their job.
At one point Mr. Ryan expressed that he had never experienced an interview process like this one. Councilor Shanley replied, “Welcome to Newburyport.” Yes, and you could practically hear the audience say “Amen.” I wanted to say, “if you think this is bad, wait to you see what the actual job is like, this will be like a walk in the park.”
Anyway, there was lots and lots more. The City Council Subcommittee did not make a recommendation on the appointment, they wanted to “sleep on it” because there was so much new information.
I don’t see how in the world they could have made a recommendation last night. I was hoping for a “slam-dunk, whew, we have a new Planning Director.” In my book, a “slam-dunk” just didn’t happen. Monday, August 28th the Newburyport City Council will take a vote, and I do not envy them in the least.
Mary Eaton
Newburyport
When I first moved here back in 1981, as I remember it, it never would have occurred to anyone to demolish an old building. Downtown Newburyport had been restored and restoration was spreading to the rest of Newburyport’s Historic District.
The idea was to remove years, if not centuries, of wallpaper, skim-coat the old plaster walls, update heating and electrical, put in much needed insulation, repair sills and rotting windows, sometimes remove years and often centuries of accumulated paint.
As far as I remember, demolition was never even on the radar. Preserving local neighborhood character was a given.
So what has changed?
People write PhDs on the subject and PhDs on the solution, this blogger doesn’t have the answers. One heartening thing, however, is that the Newburyport Preservation Trust has among its membership the kind of brain trust that could address these kinds of issues. And for that I am quite relieved and grateful.
I think we are definitely at a crossroad. Depending on your point of view our unique historic heritage is already eroding or is on the verge of eroding due to over-development. I feel that it has happened slowly and incrementally and that some of us now look around us and say, “What in the world has happened or is happening?”
It’s not like our City government is sitting idly by. It is not. In fact our City government has been very proactive over the last 4 or 5 years. We now have a 12 month demolition delay, a site plan review; we have a host or zoning changes and amendments that address the problems, including the zoning amendment that is coming up that specifically addresses “infill” in Newburyport, MA. We now have various zoning overlays and are working on our first local historic district—the Fruit Street Local Historic District. Good for the City of Newburyport, MA. I don’t think anyone in our City government would like to see the erosion of our historic heritage.
But in spite of everything that the City of Newburyport has and is doing, the climate, attitude towards protecting our historic resources appears to have changed.
It seems that the first thought is to demolish historic buildings instead of valuing there worth. I find this disturbing and I know that a lot of other people feel the same way.
I also think that if this trend continues it will have short and long term economic consequences for our City, because Newburyport will no longer be a exceptional place to live, visit, work and play.
Mary Eaton
Newburyport
I get a lot of flack, I mean a LOT of flack for the fact that I take Newburyport’s journal, the Undertoad and its editor, Tom Ryan seriously. I’ve said before on the Newburyport Political Blog that although I’m not too fond of Mr. Ryan’s (now we have two Mr. Ryans, Tom Ryan and proposed Planning Director Christopher Ryan) toadisms, and I don’t always agree with everything he writes, we need him as a fearless progressive voice. (And I also gotta say that the Current is appearing pretty fearless itself these days with the expose on Julie LaBranche (Newburyport’s soon to be departed City Planner) and everything.)
Thank your Mr. (Tom) Ryan for the piece on the front page of the Undertoad on the disarray of Newburyport’s Planning Office. Tom Ryan can say things that I would never be comfortable saying and as far as I’m concerned the article on the state of Newburyport’s Planning Office nails it. I hope in a couple of weeks when the next Undertoad is out, that Mr. Ryan will put that article up on the Undertoad Blog.
Mary Eaton
Newburyport
The Newburyport Historical Commission last night told Matthew Pieniazek of 36 Marlboro Street, who purchased 30-32 Marlboro Street that there would be a 12 month demolition delay on the property. For the moment, there is a reprieve.
While I’m relieved that a neighbor bought the property, one who has his and his neighbors’ interests at heart, I was very disappointed that demolition was the name of the game. Apparently Mr. Pieniazek’s own engineering report says that the front part of the c. 1850 building is sound.
As I understand it Newburyport’s Historical Commission had no problem with the demolition of the back part of the property. However, they hope that Mr. Pieniazek will restore the front part of this historic home. The Historical Commission hopes that they and Mr. Pieniazek can have an ongoing dialogue.
The Historical Commission pointed out that all the modern amenities could be placed at the back portion of the property. It is my understanding that there was some talk of the central chimney being in the way. It was pointed out that the central chimney was the heart and hearth of historic homes of this period, and to remove it in the name of restoration would destroy its historic heritage.
Newburyport Massachusetts has a unique history. If builders/ developers in town or out of town have the attitude that the wear and tear of an historic home is an inconvenience to making money, our unique historic heritage will be lost. And this, in the long and short term will adversely affect our economic survival, because Newburyport, MA will no longer be a distinct community in which to visit, work, live and play.
Mary Eaton
Newburyport
Christopher Ryan, the Mayor’s choice for Newburyport’s Planning Director, seems more than willing to meet with the Newburyport City Council Planning and Development Committee on Monday August 21, 2006. (That meeting is open to the public, 7 p.m. at City Hall.)
The Newburyport City Council is “going by the book” on this one, as they should. “Typically, mayoral appointments are ‘received’ by the council on a first reading and then confirmed at the next council meeting to allow time for questions or issues to be addressed.” (Newburyport Daily News, August 17, 2006.)
Councilor Tom Jones, the chairman of the Planning and Development Committee had this to say:
“We are trying to be consistent, fair and equitable…My concern is that it seems when we don’t do what the mayor wants, it becomes a contest of personalities…I’m really concerned following the rules doesn’t fit into (Moak’s) time frame and schedule.”
And Christopher Ryan had this to say:
“This is an indication how much people really care about this and (that city leaders) choose a good candidate.” “People (in Newburyport) really care and have strong feelings on issues and concerns.”
Good for Christopher Ryan.
Mary Eaton
Newburyport, MA
From the emails that I have received it seems that there is already a strong, mounting opposition to having a Senior Center at Cushing Park. (Cushing Park is off Kent Street and is often confused with Cashman Park that is along the waterfront on the North End of the City.)
When people call me about issues that I know nothing about, I try and ask them to educate me. And this was the case when I received phone calls about the Senior Center from “seniors.”
My first question was, why not the YWCA, a community center for all ages (I realize that this is a vast simplification.)
I know in middle age although I enjoy and appreciate “young” people of all different ages around town, actually having them in close proximity for any length of time is a little jarring. Not because I do not like them, I like them a lot, but because basically I am “out of practice” and am no longer “acclimated,” so to speak, to the hustle and bustle of youthful energy. If I feel this way in middle age, I would think that this would increase as I get older. And from what I understand, this is true of many older folks.
My second question was why not the Industrial Park? I like the idea of when I get older of not much traffic and lots of parking and possibly a place for a one level building. Basically, the answer, as I heard it, is that it gets lonely as one gets older and seniors do not want to be isolated from their community.
Actually when I thought about it, I remembered when the library had its temporary setting out in the Industrial Park (thanks to the great generosity of Ed Molin), it felt like I was going out to the middle of nowhere (although that was not the case) and went to the library very infrequently.
Now that the library is downtown, it is one of my favorite places to go, and I go all the time. So I can empathize with how our seniors feel about not wanting a Senior Center in a more isolated area.
This is where I think civics is very, very difficult, because there are legitimate, competing needs among our populace. And I am always impressed when we do find creative solutions or come to difficult compromises, because civics is not easy.
Mary Eaton
Newburyport
Clarification—The meeting on Monday night August 21, 2006 at 7:00 PM of the Newburyport City Council Planning and Development Committee is a public meeting to allow Newburyport City Councilors to familiarize themselves with proposed Newburyport Planning Director, Christopher Ryan.
The meeting is open to the public. The committee would like to open up the meeting to the public for comments and questions. Please feel free to attend.
Mary Eaton
Newburyport
A reader of the Newburyport Political Blog sent me this information on Shaker Heights, OH.
“Shaker Heights is a PLANNED “garden community” that sprang up beginning in 1912, and became a city in 1930. It was the vision of two developer brothers, M.J. and O.P. Vam Sweringen of Cleveland. The community began with a strict and uniform zoning code, and a master plan that worked around the natural topography of the area and designated specific locations for houses, apartments, commercial areas, public and private schools, municipal and religious buildings, and parks.
Building in Shaker was controlled by a set of restrictive covenants and building guidelines established by the Van Sweringens and known as Shaker Standards. Shaker Standards prevented the community from being developed in any way contrary to how the brothers intended. Standards limited commercial development, rental property development, and residence style and size.
Standards set roof slope angles, materials, finishes, and garage placement. All residences were required to be unique and designed by an architect. Duplex residences in the community were restricted to designated areas, and were required follow guidelines designed to give the impression that the structure was a single family home.
While there is architectural variety throughout the city, most of the houses are in the style of Colonials, Tudors & Georgians. It is very lovely and very predictable.
To this day, Shaker Heights maintains stringent building code and zoning laws, which have helped to maintain the community‚s housing stock and identity throughout the years. According to the city’s website, the building department inspects every property on a revolving schedule to make sure that property owners don‚t violate any of these codes. This makes a Local Historic District seem tame by comparison.
Granted, like Newburyport, much of Shaker Heights is a National Register District, however, it is based on very different criteria than those for Newburyport. In Shaker Heights there is no hodgepodge of architectural styles nestled against each other; there are no REAL 17th, 18th or even 19th century homes. You would NEVER find a 1950s ranch house next to the 18th century mansion of a ship‚s captain in Shaker Heights.
In Newburyport, property owners can pretty do whatever they’d like to a building, and woe to the person who tries to interfere. These folks would never survive a day in Shaker Heights, where slate roofs and wood windows are ardently protected by the CITY government, hard as that might be to imagine for residents in Newburyport, Massachusetts.
The historic preservation issues of Shaker Heights, OH are unlike those of Newburyport, MA.”
Mary Eaton
Newburyport
I think it would have been unrealistic to expect that the appointment of Christopher Ryan, the mayor’s choice for Planning Director, to pass on the first reading at last night’s Newburyport City Council meeting. City Councilors appear to be listening to their constituents, and constituents still have lots of questions.
Residents are concerned about Mr. Ryan’s time commitment. They are concerned about the fall teaching commitment. And they also want to make sure that the teaching job this fall is a onetime deal, and that teaching is not going to be an ongoing activity. Reasonable questions.
Residents want to give Mr. Ryan time to really study the Newburyport Master Plan and they would like very specific answers on how he feels about specific issues. I think that is a reasonable request
And then there is the question of historic preservation. For many the preservation of Newburyport’s unique history is one of the most important issues facing our City. Residents want to make sure that Christopher Ryan is committed whole heartedly to historic preservation in Newburyport, Massachusetts.
Mr. Ryan has cited his work in Shaker Heights, Ohio. Shaker Heights, OH was designed and built as a planned community (1912?) whose buildings were erected over a specific period of time and their style and character reflect a particular era. Newburyport obviously is quite different, having evolved over more than three centuries.
Councilor James Shanley at last night’s Newburyport City Council meeting said a very import thing. I’m paraphrasing here. Councilor Shanley said that the Planning Director is a key position and that decisions that are made would affect the City for decades if not centuries. I couldn’t agree more.
As I understand it there will be a sub-committee meeting held on Monday, August 21, 2006 to find out more about Mr. Ryan and then a special meeting on Monday August 28, 2006 to vote on Mr. Ryan’s appointment. All of this sounds very reasonable to me.
In today’s Newburyport Daily News, August 15, 2006, Mayor John Moak appears to be uneasy about losing Mr. Ryan as a candidate for Newburyport’s Planning Director saying that “Ryan has turned down other offers to accept the Newburyport position.”
I would think that this whole process would give Mr. Ryan the beginning of an idea of what it would be like to be Planning Director in Newburyport, MA. It is, as Council Shanley stated, a key position, and one that we as a City value. I think the process would indicate to Mr. Ryan that the expectations of Newburyport’s Planning Director are very high.
Mary Eaton
Newburyport
The hearing for the demolition permit for 30-32 Marlboro Street is at the Newburyport Historical Commission meeting Thursday, August 17th at 7:30 PM in the City Council Chambers.
Public comments are welcomed.
Mary Eaton
Newburyport, MA
One of the things that has happened being the editor of the Newburyport Political Blog is that all sorts of people call me and email me. It is often folks who feel as if no one is listening to them, and for some reason people feel that they have a chance of being heard by the editor of the Newburyport Political Blog.
And I get calls and emails from “seniors.” And usually those calls just about break my heart. The seniors so desperately want a Senior Center and feel that nobody is listening and nobody cares about what is important to them. That the process has been going on for so long, that the prospect of a Senior Center often seems remote.
I think that the Council on Aging and its director Rosanne Robillard do an unbelievable job. And if I should be lucky to live so long, I sure will need them and I sure would like a Senior Center.
I was heartened that Mayor John Moak is taking a good long look at Cushing Park for a potential site for the Senior Center (Newburyport Daily News, July 6, 2006.) I realize that there is opposition from the neighbors, but I am proud of our Mayor that he is paying attention to what our seniors are saying.
It is my opinion that as a society we so often focus on a “Paris Hilton culture” and the people who serve as the foundation of our society and who have the experience and wisdom we so often need, are dismissed and marginalized instead of being honored and appreciated.
As I understand it, most of our seniors feel that Cushing Park would be a good location for a Senior Center. And whether the site works out or not, I applaud our Mayor for trying.
Mary Eaton
Newburyport
(Editor’s note: Cashman Park is along the Waterfront. Cushing Park is off Kent Street.)
The following is an editorial in the Newburyport Current, Friday, August 11, 2006
“The city lost a top-notch employee last week. City Planner Julie LaBranche announced that she will, only a year into the job, leave in early September for a position on the Strafford Regional Planning Commission.
The official reason: LaBranche wanted to grow professionally.
Unfortunately, there also appear to be far more serious reasons behind her resignation. LaBranche spoke this week of not being invited to meetings between Mayor John Moak and developers, fundamental disagreements with the building commissioner, and the administration’s apparent lack of trust in her expertise.
Several members of the Planning Board – some who normally do not openly criticize the mayor – called the atmosphere “abusive” and “hostile.”
LaBranche was hired last summer and quickly gained the respect of boards and commission members who now describe her technical assistance and expertise in land use laws and low-impact development as invaluable. The city, they said, struck gold when she was hired a year ago.
LaBranche’s resignation shows the complete disconnect between the mayor and the planning office. Moak has, of course, every right to meet with whoever he wants, but to let some developers use the mayor’s office as their Wailing Wall shows a lack of respect for the city planner. Ever since Moak decided to replace former Planning Director Nick Cracknell, it has been clear that the mayor does not whole-heartedly support goals in the master plan such as design review.
It is, thus, no surprise that in Moak’s City Hall there is no room for LaBranche, who embraced the same document with its emphasis on Smart Growth and historic preservation.
The question is, and has been for nearly eight months: What is Moak’s vision for the city of Newburyport?
Now, when he is preparing to hire a new city planner with his appointee for planning director, Chris Ryan, he needs to get specific about long-term goals, beyond customer service and solid management. City planning is, needless to say, more than shuffling papers.
Poor decisions and development at any price can destroy a historic city like Newburyport. If the mayor does not realize it, let’s hope the new planning director does.
And to the detriment of Newburyport, LaBranche will have no say in it.”
I came across a really interesting article on the Web talking about what’s happening when developers turn away from “suburban sprawl” to urban areas and create “vertical sprawl,” new buzz word for me. We are not alone by any means in our fight against inappropriate infill. And I am reassured by this.
These quotes are from an article in The New York Times, Week In Review, August 6, 2006, “Cities Grow Up, and Some See Sprawl” by Nicholas Confessore. The subject is “vertical sprawl” or what we in Newburyport, MA are dealing with and would call inappropriate “infill.”
“We want to protect these places from being taken over by infill and driving out working-class people.”
“…in working-class urban communities, it means displacement and gentrification, often by redevelopment…”
“…high-density infill projects are too often tilted toward affluent buyers, which forces lower-income families out…”
“…vertical sprawl can differ from the suburban kind in the particulars, the general issues are remarkably consistent: traffic, parking and the cost of supporting new projects with schools, water and other municipal services.”
“..the battles over vertical sprawl tend to pit neighborhood associations against wealthy developers and builder-friendly politicians.”
(Infill) “…a stalking horse for developers…”
Mary Eaton
Newburyport
Well, it seems as if the last couple of posts have hit a nerve and not just in Newburyport, MA.
In response to my “under whelmedness” post concerning the Mayor’s pick for Newburyport’s Planning Director, I got an anonymous email from someone who does not know Christopher Ryan and does not “currently work in MA.”
If I had had the “mood watch” checked on my email, it would have given me a 3 hot red pepper warning. Two hot red peppers is “probably offensive” and three is “on fire.”
One angry human being. “Like it or not, it is a well accepted role and responsibility of planners to find common ground between the desires of developers and the needs of a community. Get used to it.”
I rather like Audrey McCarthy’s quote in the Daily News Article, “Planning Head’s Appointment in Limbo,” by Stephanie Chelf, August 9, 2006:
“Councilor Audrey McCarthy said she is willing to support Ryan’s teaching job because it is temporary, but is still undecided on whether to support the appointment.
‘A lot of it has to do with uniqueness of Newburyport’s history – we’re on a fine line of overdevelopment,’ McCarthy said. ‘That’s what I’m hearing from constituents; they want someone who values historic preservation, there is no compromise there.’ ”
Thank you Audrey McCarthy, I couldn’t have said it better myself.
Mary Eaton
Newburyport
In earlier posts on the search for Newburyport’s Planning Director, there was a certain note of hope in this blogger’s blogging, a sense that someone competent would be a relief.
The tone of this blogger has changed since the early news hit that Mayor John Moak had found a possible appointee.
Now why would that be?
Three things (which have nothing to do with the appointee at all.)
One is the resignation of Julie LaBranche. Ms LaBranche has been described as “intelligent, knowledgeable, generous, professional, hardworking, talented” to just downright “great.” Certainly I have found her to be extremely bright, conscientious, personable and she appears to me to go out of her way to be accommodating.
One would think that those at City Hall would be proud to have a person such as Julie LaBranche in Newburyport’s Planning Office.
The word on the street, however, is that Ms LaBranche has been treated badly, with disrespect, intimidation and ire. The sources are so various and consistent that one cannot help but think they are most probably true.
I can actually see where people might have had a personality clash with Nick Cracknell, strong personality that he is. But Julie LaBranche? This baffles me. How one could treat Ms LaBranche with anything but courtesy is beyond this blogger’s understanding.
It almost feels as if there were people that went out of their way to make Ms LaBranche’s life so unpleasant that she would leave her job as City Planner. I am not pleased.
This also leaves a Planning Office in complete disarray. Not even superman could bring this mess up to speed in any kind of timely fashion.
The second is the confirmation that yes, John Moak’s philosophy appears to be that development, good, bad or indifferent, is so important to the tax base and the overall economy, that things like historic preservation, smart growth, community preservation, open space seem to be only vaguely on the radar, if in fact they are on the radar at all.
All of this coincides with the emergence of yet another developer, Mr. Minot Frye from Wenham, MA, who apparently intends to demolish the federalist house at 11-13 Ship Street and put up two condominiums. This is a developer from out of town, with apparently deep pockets, and deep connections, who has his sights on Newburyport, Massachusetts and does not have the City’s best interest at heart in anyway shape or form. Apparently this gentleman has the attitude of “I own it, and I’ll do anything with it that I please.” This does not work for me.
Blogging gloom is so unfortunate. And this blogger is trying to figure out what in the world she will do.
Mary Eaton
Newburyport