Mayor Moak’s platform touted his “leadership” abilities and his openness. I think a leader listens to his/her constituency, studies all sides of the issue with an open mind, and then formulates a plan/action based on a balance between perceived needs and what’s best for the community.

The role of a Mayor is not to thwart public comment or to only appoint people who mirror his/her point of view. A case in point: Mary Lou Supple has endeavored to educate people, listen to the multitude of opinions about the fate of the waterfront, and help the NRA Board and City reach a consensus as to the best use of the NRA lots. If she is not re-appointed to the NRA, I think we will see a lot of contentious attitudes about the waterfront’s fate.

People come to Newburyport because it is unique; because the waterfront, with its boats (working vessels, sailboats, as well as fancy yachts) reminds us of our maritime heritage; because it’s fun to stroll along the waterfront. There are other areas of Newburyport better suited to parking. If Waterfront West becomes a reality, Mr. Karp should provide parking for any new development; he should not look to the public to provide parking that will benefit him and his investors.

The (new) NRA questionnaire will help the Mayor, City Council, and the NRA decide on the fate of the NRA-owned land. Let’s get the questionnaire circulated (widely) and see what “the people” (once again) would like.

Vicki Carr, Newburyport

(Editor’s note: The NRA survey arrived in my mailbox today along with the City Census. I filled it out. I’m hoping everyone else does too. And thank you Vicki Carr for being a guest blogger.)